Danny CarltonThis is what one admin said regarding this site...
...it is a non-authoratitive source that is not clearly endorsed or verified by a professional organisation, and on those grounds alone qualifies poorly for inclusion into Wikipedia
The reason I wanted to address the problem was because Wikipedia was #1 on Google’s search for "Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia". Since then I’ve refreshed my sitemap and submitted it to Google and now this site is #1 and Wikipedia is #12 (off the front page, which means "Google limbo")
I am seriously not impressed with Wikipedia. Not only is it filled with nonsense, they haven’t least interest in actually trying to be relevant.