Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia

ATTENTION MEDIA & OTHERS SEEKING INTERVIEWS! 
If you represent a media company, are a student writing a report or anyone interested in interviewing our visitors, please seek permission (see email address at the bottom of the page) before posting your requests or emailing solicitations for any talk show, magazine, thesis, census or other interview on any message board on this site. If not, your posts WILL be removed. Please respect the privacy of our members.

    Return to Page 8Post reply       


Right idea...wrong tack
Mar. 4th, 2005   12:23am
I have a dear friend who is blind from diabetes... she tells people that she is blind from diabetes.

Anyways, you've got the right point, Danny, but wrong tack on it.

The gay thing that is studied often with CAH and lesbians has nothing to do with intersex, and I don't think activists are using it under the intersex label to prove anything. I don't think the researchers who are focused on it are doing it for social reasons, either.

However, there is a much higher rate of homosexuality and bisexuality in women with CAH than the unaffected population. Compare that with women with AIS---women who have XY genes---and you'll find that they have homosex rates about the same as unaffected women. That's not an intersex thing---it's a hormonal thing.

Research on the above is easy to find.

The LGBTI stuff you see some orgs adding is actually a bit disturbing to many within the intersex community in my experience. The reason for that is if you take all of those with some type of intersex, most are not queer in any way--they are not lesbian, they are not gay, they are not bi, and they are not trans. In fact, there is an incredible amount of homophobia and transphobia within the intersex populations I have encountered.

Most orgs who add that "I" are simply trying to be trendy. I personally am pretty against it for a number of reasons. In fact, I am speaking about it this weekend---to an LGBT organization.

It's ironic that you used diabetes because it is something I use in arguing against LGBTI---intersex is something you are born with and it's not an identity for most people, it's not a sexual orientation, and it's usually not a gender identity for most people. It's not trans, and it's not gay.

Most with intersex are not focused upon it (but many are quietly upset over the shame, secrecy, and surgery issues) If you ask most people with some type of intersex what they label themselves as---they will first say male or female, and if queer--lesbian, gay, bi, or trans. Whatever it is they were born with will often come last. If married with kids---that label will come first.

With those orgs and groups who insist on adding an "I", I often suggest they also add a "D" to encompass those in their community with diabetes. It usually makes the point that intersex is as relevant to LGBT as diabetes is.

Part of the misperceptions of course lie within who is actually speaking out on intersex issues---it tends to be lesbians for some reason. My guess on why that is because we already have dealt with much stigma over who we love and it becomes easier and often a natural progression.

Betsy
--quickly putting on my fireproof suit.

Betsy




    Return to Page 8Post reply       


This Thread





- Post a reply - 

page processed in 0.205006837845 seconds
Rare Disease Search Engine, Homeschool Sites, Online Homeschool, Online Income, Ethical Adsense, Creative writing, Family Web Hosting, Christian Radio, Tulsa Parks